« Say it in Seven Words (or less) | Main | Reply All: The Worst Software Feature Ever Invented? »

Wednesday, 23 May 2007

What to Remember When Selling to Investors

NOTE: You may now subscribe to Comunicado. Just drop your email address in the Subscribe window to the right.

Often good ideas don't get funded because entrepreneurs focus on the technology itself, rather than the more important question: "How will the technology be used?"

Now that Internet technology has matured, questions about its ability to deliver have been replaced by questions about how it will be used -- to bring buyers and sellers together, create communities, educate consumers or exploit other money-making opportunities.

Technology is the least of your problems
New ventures face four risks: technology, business development, cash flow -- and partners that can work together.

Ironically, the technology is the easiest risk to manage in the technology-enabled business.

Look at successful Internet ventures. They don't sell a technology, rather combine technologies to deliver a unique experience. Enpresence, for example, isn't about Bluetooth and wireless technology. It's about alerting mobile phone users when they are near people or places that interest them.

It might be a message that the film they've been wanting to see starts in an hour at a theater around the corner -- or an extension of their online dating service that Mr. or Miss Right is at the Starbucks on the next block.  Sure, things like Bluetooth make new business ideas work, but it's the business model that must endure the rigor for funding.

Get technology questions off your critical path
If your plan's viability is dependent upon a proof-of-concept that the technology will work, get those projects out of the way before you start knocking on investor doors.

Bottom line:  if you're seeking funding for an IT-enabled business, be careful not to clutter your presentation with a bunch of technology 101 tutorials or explanations of how the technology works.

Focus your pitch on how the technology will be used to create value. Put all the tutorials in the appendix. If you must talk about how the technology works in the main body of your pitch, keep it to one slide, two at most.

Think about early Google investors. They got rich, not so much from the creation of the technology, but from the technology's ubiquitous adoption to affect a variety of business and societal outcomes.   

As CFO James Haft from USCondex said recently, "More money is made from using technology than creating it."

Joyoftech_5

Posted by Richard Fouts at 05:00 PM | Permalink

Comments

Agree w/your POV. It's also important for capital-seekers to consider 2 more issues: capital allocation and return on investment (ROI). Capital providers need to know that the funds they are investing are being allocated wisely and not spread too thin. If there are 5 technologies a company is pursuing, the 1 or 2 that are on the company's critical path should get the lion's share, if not all, of the funding to ensure their success. Less important or time-sensitive projects can then be funded later internally if the company generates cash flow, or with a follow-on investment. ROR is another concept that capital-seekers should present to capital-providers. In the end, investors need to see a return. If a company in need of funding demonstrates the potential return, it will have a greater likelihood of garnering an investment. The return need not necessarily come from a new market, revenue stream, etc. Cost-cutting, enabling better & more efficient management, or complementing another business in the company are examples of benefits that can be measured in dollars, and for which one can compute an ROI.

Posted by: Nicole | Mar 10, 2006 4:33:04 PM

Thank you Nicole, for reminding us ... that investors aren't always looking for a business model that disrupts traditional methods of doing buisness. Ideas that apply noticable, innovative efficiencies (which have long term sustaining impact) to proven markets are equally appealing.

Posted by: Richard | Mar 15, 2006 10:45:35 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.