« Why Your Buyers are Changing | Main | Communicating the Pros and Cons of Open Source Computing »
Wednesday, 02 April 2008
Why Do Business Strategies Fail?
I recently attended a forum of executives from Global 1000 companies that explored some answers to this question - so I thought I'd share them:
- Strategies fail when they aren’t customer driven. Enough said. When strategies focus on internal power structures, they don’t support the people that really write your paycheck
- Strategies don’t pull the right levers. You may have an ambitious (and admirable) strategic vision (be the biggest PC manufacturer in the world) but do you have the right assets to make it work? Moreover, are you pulling the levers that take advantage of your best assets? If your strongest asset lies in customer intimacy and you're pursuing a strategy that requires strength in product excellence - you're not pulling the right lever.
- Strategies think functions, not assets. Companies tend to develop weak strategies by focusing on their marketing, sales, and engineering functions vs. the assets best suited to deliver their goals. Is your best asset an existing customer base in an adjacent market, product leadership, or a superior service model? Lead with your strongest asset (which may not always align with your strongest function).
- Strategies aren’t operationalized. Most organizations put their time and energy into the strategy document, overlooking how they will identify, fund and source the projects that will make the strategy deliver. Until you extend the strategy into your operational model, you haven’t executed.
- Strategies aren’t communicated. If your strategy is to become the best in service, what does that mean to the everyday employee? Get managers to “lead from behind” and show by example those things you’re doing everyday to become better at service. For example, if a suggestion to improve a process doesn’t link to a customer, or isn’t backed by data that represents needs expressed by real customers, do some additional homework.
- Strategies become shelfware. While documents are important, the process of engaging the business in strategy is where the real value lies. The more you get the business and its intelligence involved – at more levels and intervals – the better chance you have realizing the goals of strategy.
- The word strategy is hugely misused. See the first bullet. Have you ever noticed how a project suddenly becomes “strategic” or “transformational” when it goes for funding?
Posted by Richard Fouts at 02:38 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454724c69e200e551a890fe8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why Do Business Strategies Fail?:
Comments
I don't get your comment about assets and functions. If my strongest asset is my product, wouldn't that mean I have strong product development function?
Posted by: Shauna | Apr 3, 2008 10:27:59 AM
I understand your comment, so let me clarify. I've actually worked for organizations that had strong product development and good products, accompanied by a lousy marketing function. Since product development ultimately reports up to marketing, the product is not supported by its own function when it's time to go to market. In this case, a company would be well advised to take its great product to market with great distributors. Or invest in better marketing (which takes time). If time to market is an issue (and when is it not?) the former strategy is appropriate.
I've also worked in an organization where marketing and sales were quite good, but the products we were selling were deficient and well below market standards. The company succeeded by leading with their strengths: good marketers and a fantastic sales force, partnered with strong solution providers.
When you go-to-market you have to take a good, hard look at yourself and evaluate your best asset(s). Apple, for example, doesn't go to market on service. They lead with product. If they were ever to pursue a market opportunity that demanded service, and competed on service, they'd be in trouble. Notice Apple doesn't zealously pursue the corporate computing market.
Posted by: Richard | Apr 3, 2008 10:40:49 AM
Plato may have dies thousands of years ago, but this quote on Leadership sure seems applicable today: A tyrant is always stirring up some war or other, in order that the people may require a leader.
Posted by: Leadership | Nov 10, 2008 11:00:20 PM

